trying it out

Yes, yet another miniblog.

Posterous seems to be trying to get people to switch...

...from Ning, which strikes me as odd, because the way most people use Ning, to me, seems to be very unlike how people use Posterous. Well, given the closed-ness of Ning's formats, anything that allows people to export their data is good.

It seems that Posterous's forte is blogging, either individual or group, whereas Ning is a more generalist community platform/portal. The closest analogue to Ning would probably be Buddypress, although that's still in development.

Filed under  //   posterous  
Posted June 23, 2010

recent thoughts on microblogging

I heard that now WP.com is having a Posterous importer. This is
interesting, as Tumblr is much larger, and it also seems easy to
import Tumblr through its API (after all, Posterous can do it); but it
seems that WP.com has decided Posterous is a better target for their
importing efforts. Could it be that they perceive Posterous as somehow
more WP-like? Perhaps because it has fewer explicitly social features
(such as the reblogging thing) than Tumblr?

Anyhow, as of late, Tumblr has been rolling out feature after feature.
Admittedly, some of them are not very large, and some could be
designed better (IMHO), but they do seem to be designed with the needs
of the Tumblr audience in mind (to wit, the Formspring replacement).

Posterous has been relatively quiet in comparison, but I expect
they're planning some big stuff. Actually, there are some things I'd
like to see in Posterous:

a) When you login on the posterous.com main screen, the middle part of
the screen doesn't change. (Navigation options appear, but they're
rather small) It's still that posterous promotion material. I would
assume that most of the people logging in already are familiar w/ the
capacities of Posterous, so it just seems like a waste to not have the
screen change to some kind of dashboard, as Tumblr does. I'm not sure
what the ideal Posterous logged-in screen would be, but I would hope
it would be more useful.

b) Some kind of Directory or interest-finding algorithim. One thing
that Tumblr really does try to do is create ways of finding more
Tumblrs, in an organized fashion. They've tried several different ways
of doing this, with varying degrees of success. Right now there does
seem to be a kind of leaderboard system on Posterous, but the
organization there is fairly ambiguous. There's no sense about what
the recommended blogs are each about, or which ones would appeal to me
in particular.

c) Firefox plugin.The Javascript bookmarklet is well-done, but for
some reason runs slowly.

Six Apart creates Tumblr-type microblog

Elena informed me that Six Apart has released Typepad Micro, which is basically a Tumblr knock-off plus native commenting.

This is met with some snark:  http://twitter.com/gruber/status/5807355462

An employee of Six Apart's main rival, Automattic, talks about it:  http://terrychay.com/article/typepad-micro.shtml

"The biggest lesson learned from P2 is that if you are looking for “micro” style content, you must put a content add page in the reading page: just like Twitter, Tumblr, and P2 do." (P2 is a Wordpress 'microblog' style layout)

http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2009/11/typepad-goes-after-tumblr.html
An interesting assertion is made:  eventually, users will demand reblogging EVERYWHERE, including in regular Typepad and Wordpress. Also some interesting comments on the "veil" of Tumblr; I have to say, you CANNOT understand Tumblr without going "behind the veil" and seeing it from the perspective of a logged in user.

It's an open question whether this will work:  it's supposed to be free because the objective is to promote the Typepad platform. Yet, will people still want to pay for Typepad when they can use Wordpress.com for free? Or Tumblr for free? Do people who microblog even want to do regular type blogging and thus become Typepad customers? (I think what we're seeing is the casual/personal component of blogging basically leaving for microblogs and Twitter)

Anyway, I have a post brewing on Tumblr's discovery features and promotion. [

Filed under  //   six apart   tumblr  

Music of the day:

(download)

Testing out Posterous's music u/ling function

Filed under  //   music  

Hmm, new posting stuff

I'm pretty impressed by the new manage posting page in Posterous.
Still finding it kind of hard to get used to posting through email
also though. Though, one thing about the website: when I'm logged in
and see the top page, shouldn't I see something else other than the
"join posterous!!" pitch? After all, if I have logged in, I have
already joined Posterous!

Oh well. I have no idea what kind of people are reading this Posterous
blog (or is it a 'lifestream'?), but I had might as well dump some
links I was collecting for a post on the Dreamwidth blog about
freemium websites and related issues.

http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/03/09/free-to-freemium-5-lessons-learned-from-...
http://mashable.com/2008/06/13/freemium/
http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/04/20/3-key-ideas-from-a-recent-freemium-dinne...
http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/12/29/freemium-business-model-case-study-adult...
http://nabeel.typepad.com/brinking/2008/09/theres-been-som.html
http://lsvp.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/successful-mmogs-can-see-1-2-in-monthly-...
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/07/freemium-services-and-the-economics-of-s...
http://gigaom.com/2007/12/12/microblogging-a-case-study-in-market-verticaliza...
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/social_networks_growing_while_other_soci...
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_evolution_of_personal_publ.php
http://www.centernetworks.com/social-network-theory
http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-we...
http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/the-network-effect-in-web-20-is-also...
http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/the-human-factor-in-social-media-par...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10314283-16.html

Filed under  //   Posterous  

Google Wave

Still haven't gotten a Google Wave invite yet. This has been one of the most hyped developments ever, and it's even more interesting than Gmail because it's an original product.

I was talking to someone who's been using it for awhile, though, and while he finds it very useful for business purposes, right now his personal Wave account is mostly unused because he has no one to talk to (wave with?) there. So yeah, even if I were to get a Wave invite now, I could play with it, but not really use it for much, because none of my friends have it yet.

I can see it replacing GoogleTalk for many purposes, though, because it seems it does sharing media better.

Filed under  //   google wave  

Theming is here

http://blog.posterous.com/posterous-theming-its-here-its-live-and-its-t

 At long last, theming has come to Posterous. I think now I can start
recommending it to others.

Filed under  //   Posterous  

Very interesting link about the publishing industry

http://bnreview.barnesandnoble.com/t5/Reviews-Essays/Redactor-Agonistes/ba-p/...

Some quotes: 

"Genuine literary discernment is often a liability in editors. And it should be -- at least when it is unaccompanied by a broader, more popular sensibility it should be. When you are trying to acquire books that hundreds of thousands of people will buy, read, and like, you have to have some of the eclectic and demotic taste of the reading public. I have this completely unfounded theory that there are a million very good -- engaged, smart, enthusiastic -- generalist readers in America. There are five hundred thousand extremely good such readers. There are two hundred and fifty thousand excellent readers. There are a hundred and twenty-five thousand alert, active, demanding, well-educated (sometimes self-well-educated), and thoughtful -- that is, literarily superb -- readers in America. More than half of those people will happen not to have the time or taste for the book you are publishing. So, if these numbers are anything remotely like plausible, refined taste, no matter how interesting it may be, will limit your success as an acquiring editor. I"

"The volume of sales of the No. 6 book on the New York Times fiction bestseller list in 2009 is significantly lower than the volume of the No. 6 bestseller five years ago. Four and three and two years ago, too, almost certainly."

"You must almost entirely give up reading for pleasure."

"But they and you, as the editor, silently collude in trying to ignore the obvious when you tell them that the first printing of your book will be three thousand copies, that it will not have full-color galleys, that no advertising or tour is planned, and that it has been assigned to a publicist who up until yesterday worked in the Xerox department. Why the collusion? Because this is a business fuelled largely by writers' need for attention, and no one wants to crush any writer's dreams before a book is even published. Especially since every now and then they actually come true."

"Usually, writers, like anyone else who performs in public and desires wide recognition, no matter how successful they become, have an unslakeable thirst for attention and approval -- in my opinion (and, I'm embarrassed to say, in my own case) usually left over from some early-childhood deficit or perception of deficit in the attention-and-approval department. You will frequently find yourself serving as an emotional valet to the people you work with."

Does RSS suck?

http://uxhero.com/user-experience-reviews/rss-is-not-dead-it-just-really-suck...

Hmm. I do think they have a point. RSS can be fiddly and confusing. Also, the way authenticated RSS is implemented REALLY sucks. I still have not figured out how to have authenticated RSS with my WP the way I want it.

Ebooks will destroy everything!!

http://ebooktest.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-eink-epub-and-ebooks-will-fail.html

" It will lead to a race-to-the-bottom that will ultimately destroy book publishing -- not just as we know it, but period."

Now this is a tad apocalyptic, isn't it? The parts about how ebook readers are now just not good enough to justify the expense do ring very true with me. I might buy an ebook reader, as they are now, they simply don't justify the prices. If it were around $50, like these people, I would consider buying one.

Filed under  //   ebooks